═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ DISCOVERY WAYPOINT — CURRENT VS FUTURE STATE MAPPING Current/future state map | 90–120 min | 5–12 people | Difficulty: Moderate discoverywaypoint.com/techniques/current-vs-future-state-mapping ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ BEFORE YOU START Program / transformation: ______________________________ Date: _______________ Facilitator: _____________________ Scope (what process or experience are we mapping?): _____ Decision this map must unlock: _________________________ ⚠ Anchor current state with evidence, not memory. Bring: current metrics, complaints, and incident data. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 1 — SUCCESS DEFINITION [0–20 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Success metric (measurable): __________________________ Success horizon (when?): ______________________________ Who decides if we've succeeded? _______________________ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 2 — CURRENT STATE [20–55 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── How it works today: __________________________________________________________ Key metrics today: __________________________________________________________ Friction and pain (with evidence source): 1. _______________________________________ | Source: ___ 2. _______________________________________ | Source: ___ 3. _______________________________________ | Source: ___ 4. _______________________________________ | Source: ___ Workarounds people use (signals of unmet needs): __________________________________________________________ Teams and systems involved: __________________________________________________________ ⚠ "It's always been this way" is not evidence. If you can't name a source, mark it as assumption. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 3 — FUTURE STATE [55–90 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── How it would work: __________________________________________________________ Target metrics (specific and testable): __________________________________________________________ What users would experience differently: 1. _______________________________________________________ 2. _______________________________________________________ 3. _______________________________________________________ What internal operations would change: 1. _______________________________________________________ 2. _______________________________________________________ What does NOT change (scope boundary): __________________________________________________________ ⚠ "Better, faster, easier" is not a future state. Write a measurable outcome. If you can't measure it, refine it. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 4 — GAP ANALYSIS + TRANSITION ACTIONS [90–120 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Gap | Type | Priority _____________________________ | Process/Tech/People | H / M / L _____________________________ | Process/Tech/People | H / M / L _____________________________ | Process/Tech/People | H / M / L _____________________________ | Process/Tech/People | H / M / L First transition moves: Action | Owner | Date ______________________________ | ___________ | ______ ______________________________ | ___________ | ______ ______________________________ | ___________ | ______ ⚠ No owner = won't happen. Assign before you close. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── QUALITY CHECK ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ☐ Current state anchored in evidence, not opinion ☐ Future state has at least one measurable success signal ☐ Every gap has a type (Process / Tech / People) ☐ Every transition action has a named owner and due date ☐ Scope boundary is explicit Full facilitation guide: discoverywaypoint.com/techniques/current-vs-future-state-mapping Discovery Waypoint — discoverywaypoint.com