═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ DISCOVERY WAYPOINT — IMPACT VS EFFORT PRIORITISATION Prioritization matrix | 45–75 min | 4–12 people | Difficulty: Low discoverywaypoint.com/techniques/impact-vs-effort-prioritisation ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ BEFORE YOU START Opportunities / initiatives to prioritize: ______________ ________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ Facilitator: _____________________ Decision this matrix must inform: ______________________ ⚠ Include an engineering or ops estimator. Effort scores without technical input are guesses. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 1 — CALIBRATE SCALES [0–10 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Agree what High/Low means before scoring anything. IMPACT — High means: ___________________________________ IMPACT — Low means: ____________________________________ EFFORT — High means: ___________________________________ EFFORT — Low means: ____________________________________ Calibration item (one well-understood initiative): Item: _________________________ | Impact: ___ | Effort: ___ (Use this as the reference point for all other placements.) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── 2×2 CANVAS [10–40 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Place each initiative. Brief rationale for each placement. HIGH IMPACT │ ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐ │ │ │ LOW │ STRATEGIC │ QUICK WIN │ LOW EFFORT │ BETS │ Do first │ EFFORT │ Plan these │ │ ├─────────────┼─────────────┤ │ │ │ │ FILL-IN │ HARD │ │ Low value │ SLOG │ │ deprioritize│ Avoid now │ └─────────────┴─────────────┘ LOW IMPACT Placement log: Initiative | Impact | Effort | Quadrant _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ _______________________________ | H/M/L | H/M/L | ________ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 3 — CHALLENGE OUTLIERS [40–60 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Items with high disagreement (± 2 positions): Item: ___________________________ | Disagreement: ________ Resolution: ___________________________________________ Item: ___________________________ | Disagreement: ________ Resolution: ___________________________________________ ⚠ Do not confuse urgency with impact. "We need to do this now" is urgency. "This moves the needle" is impact. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── STEP 4 — PRIORITY TIERS [60–75 min] ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── NOW (Quick wins + top strategic bets): 1. _____________________ 2. _____________________ 3. _____________________ NEXT (Strategic bets to plan): 1. _____________________ 2. _____________________ 3. _____________________ LATER / DEPRIORITIZE: 1. _____________________ 2. _____________________ 3. _____________________ Owner for next planning step: __________________________ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── QUALITY CHECK ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ☐ Scales were defined before any item was placed ☐ A calibration item was used as a reference ☐ Technical input was included for effort estimates ☐ Priority tiers have named owners Full facilitation guide: discoverywaypoint.com/techniques/impact-vs-effort-prioritisation Discovery Waypoint — discoverywaypoint.com